SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

I wonder if its literally tiring, or only morally draining...

Started by RPGPundit, November 07, 2006, 08:54:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Akrasia

The thing that I don't understand about the 4e obsession is this: why not simply focus on the games that you like NOW?

Maybe you won't even like 4e.  People still play OD&D, 1e AD&D, RC D&D, etc., today.  So why not just keep playing 3e?  It's not as though enough material hasn't already been produced to last a lifetime.

So just keep playing the games that you enjoy.  Whenever 4e is released, by all means look at it.  But it is quite possible that you will not like it, or simply prefer whatever you're playing now.

Why the obsession of figuring out when 4e will be released, and what changes it will make, if you already have a game system (or systems) that satisfy your needs?
:confused:
RPG Blog: Akratic Wizardry (covering Cthulhu Mythos RPGs, TSR/OSR D&D, Mythras (RuneQuest 6), Crypts & Things, etc., as well as fantasy fiction, films, and the like).
Contributor to: Crypts & Things (old school \'swords & sorcery\'), Knockspell, and Fight On!

James J Skach

Quote from: AkrasiaThe thing that I don't understand about the 4e obsession is this: why not simply focus on the games that you like NOW?

Maybe you won't even like 4e.  People still play OD&D, 1e AD&D, RC D&D, etc., today.  So why not just keep playing 3e?  It's not as though enough material hasn't already been produced to last a lifetime.

So just keep playing the games that you enjoy.  Whenever 4e is released, by all means look at it.  But it is quite possible that you will not like it, or simply prefer whatever you're playing now.

Why the obsession of figuring out when 4e will be released, and what changes it will make, if you already have a game system (or systems) that satisfy your needs?
:confused:
It's a great question.  I would guess it has to do, specifically with repsect to D&D4, with the Living campaigns.  Many are run by the RPGA which is, as I understand it, run by WOTC.  If they put out 4E, you can be sure they will migrate any and all campaigns over which they have control/influence.

This is a stronger influence than you might think.  When I came back to gaming after a long, long absence, the "new" D&D, 3.5 at that point, was explained to me through the eyes of Living Greyhawk. A rough quote: "Oh yeah, the new D&D is cool, and you play it with people all over the world inthis huge campaign..." etc.
The rules are my slave, not my master. - Old Geezer

The RPG Haven - Talking About RPGs

Casey777

Quote from: AkrasiaThe thing that I don't understand about the 4e obsession is this: why not simply focus on the games that you like NOW?

Maybe you won't even like 4e.  People still play OD&D, 1e AD&D, RC D&D, etc., today.  So why not just keep playing 3e?  It's not as though enough material hasn't already been produced to last a lifetime.

IMO it falls under the "I won't play a game unless it's in print & has a lot of supplements in print and upcoming" mentality. And liking new shinies to gaze at. :p

Me I prefer a game that works and out of the core book(s). There are few out of print core game books that are hard to find and/or cost more than a new book, and usually those are either worth the hunt or not worth notice.

Nicephorus

Quote from: AkrasiaWhy the obsession of figuring out when 4e will be released, and what changes it will make, if you already have a game system (or systems) that satisfy your needs?
:confused:

I think there are two components:

1. general nature of people to try to predict the future on fields they're interested in.  It's kinda like predicting who will win and election or win the super bowl.

2.  A small group was looking for an early release of 4.0 as a sign that WOTC wasn't doing well because they wanted WOTC to fail.

jcfiala

I don't think we're going to see a 4th edition in a while, and here's why: Wizards has hit their 'second wind' and are releasing a lot of really high-quality stuff these days.  People are talking about how good it is on the forums, and in the game shops, and it's selling.  I don't think there's any need for a 4th edition, even if you're just looking at WotC's bottom line.

People get up in Wizards' face about being yanked around by Hasbro because of the (early) release of 3.5, but I can't say I've seen anything else that Wizards has done that's obviously because Hasbro wants more $$$.  I don't think Hasbro's going to force a 4th edition until there's more of a need for one.
 

Yamo

Quote from: RPGPunditThey don't get that Wizards has as much risk of loss in a new edition as it has of gain; they are better off doing a "re-imaging" of D&D (with things like the new Basic set) and holding off on a new edition until its clear that its absolutely necessary.

Sales will determine the appropriate time and sales alone. When a dip of sufficient size is projected, a spike (in the form of a new edition) will be arranged.

Anybody without access to WotC's books is just pulling guesses out of their asses.
In order to qualify as a roleplaying game, a game design must feature:

1. A traditional player/GM relationship.
2. No set story or plot.
3. No live action aspect.
4. No win conditions.

Don't like it? Too bad.

Click here to visit the Intenet's only dedicated forum for Fudge and Fate fans!

RPGPundit

Quote from: NicephorusI think there are two components:

1. general nature of people to try to predict the future on fields they're interested in.  It's kinda like predicting who will win and election or win the super bowl.

2.  A small group was looking for an early release of 4.0 as a sign that WOTC wasn't doing well because they wanted WOTC to fail.

With group number 2 almost always being the instigators of the rampant rumours, lies, and speculations that all the "number 1s" end up diving into.

All part of the pointless and nonsensical effort to try to subvert D&D/Wizards.

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.