As a former science major I should mention that so-called social "sciences" were always at best a "soft" science.
Things like chemistry and math are actual sciences. 2+2=4, period. Mix two particular chemicals under certain conditions and the result will always be the same.
Recently an article in that "recommended by Pocket" claimed that the view of women as gatherers and men as hunters was not true, that "new evidence" suggested that women did hunt the mammoth (yeah, right). This "new evidence" is nothing more than feminist demands. Margaret Mead did terrible damage to the once-legitimate science of anthropology.
When it comes to any sort of study looking for bias from whites, including children, notice how we are never given details about anything. This is because the "social scientists" WANT a certain outcome, to prove their already-decided conclusions. The idea that white toddlers can be racially biased at two years of age but not black or hispanic toddlers is so obviously SJW it's disgusting, and would require such a bizarre twist in the theory of evolution (which I do not believe in- nobody knows how we got here) as to be the stuff of bad 1990's science fiction.
Those Hasbro re-education camp...oh, excuse me, "sensitivity training" sessions- are merely the next logical link in what has been happening for decades now- whitey is evil. The next step from there is to have "critical race theory experts" go to kindergarten or nursery schools and "educate" white children by putting them in chains to show them what whites were guilty of- as has already been done in places. Me, I would have hit that smug &*$$@*&! with a heavy chair even as a kid. Which only proves I'm a racist, of course. Right?
Keep this website going, rpgPundit. We need it. Especially now.