This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: "Dead" Levels  (Read 7982 times)

Batman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
"Dead" Levels
« Reply #165 on: August 09, 2015, 11:19:49 PM »
Quote from: Orphan81;847775
After seeing the many responses, and different schools of thought in this thread, it's made me decide 5th edition did it right. You always get something every level...even if it's a very small "something" like an extra use of an ability per day.

I use to start my PC's off at Level 3 back in the 3.0 days, because the first levels sucked so much and I heard an apocryphal tale somewhere about how it was recommended if your PC's weren't farm folk just starting their career.

5th edition is the first iteration of Dungeons and Dragons where I've started PC's at level 1 and have loved it, and they've enjoyed it to. You can get to level 2 in about one session, and there's an immediate, if small, boost in ability and power.


I agree, and add to the fact that a +1 to attack rolls is a significant boost to your character unlike in 3.x and to a lesser extent 4e. All in all, a pretty good system.
" I'm Batman "

Omega

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • O
  • Posts: 17093
"Dead" Levels
« Reply #166 on: August 10, 2015, 12:33:17 AM »
Quote from: Orphan81;847775
After seeing the many responses, and different schools of thought in this thread, it's made me decide 5th edition did it right. You always get something every level...even if it's a very small "something" like an extra use of an ability per day.


That is kinda how it was with AD&D as well, a some classes got something at level 2 and then X levels later something else. The fighter got an extra attack at levels 7 and 13. Just about everyone got something around level 9. Paladins got some powers at levels 2-3-4 and so on. While rangers got stuff at later levels and the casters and thieves were constantly improving what they did but did not gain much of anything "new". Which was perfectly fine with me. New spells or slots is NOT a dead level.

In BX clerics did not even get spells till level 2.

Bloody Stupid Johnson

  • Senior Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3366
"Dead" Levels
« Reply #167 on: August 10, 2015, 07:03:23 PM »
Quote from: Orphan81;847775
After seeing the many responses, and different schools of thought in this thread, it's made me decide 5th edition did it right. You always get something every level...even if it's a very small "something" like an extra use of an ability per day.

I use to start my PC's off at Level 3 back in the 3.0 days, because the first levels sucked so much and I heard an apocryphal tale somewhere about how it was recommended if your PC's weren't farm folk just starting their career.

5th edition is the first iteration of Dungeons and Dragons where I've started PC's at level 1 and have loved it, and they've enjoyed it to. You can get to level 2 in about one session, and there's an immediate, if small, boost in ability and power.


Well I concluded you can't make everyone happy.

As well as the people who want a pony every level and the people who don't care one way or the other, its clear there are people who actually don't want stuff every level. Some of them specifically to piss in my Cheerios, but in among the old school flapdoodle there's a mostly legit complaint that in order to give someone a special ability every level, requires a game have a complexity above a certain level i.e. in most cases to give someone an ability to do something there has to be a rule that without that ability, they can't do it.

Admittedly 5E IMHO actually isn't too bad for this (rulings not rules and all that), there are a few places where they've stolen a basic ability and sold it back at an exorbitant rate like your ranger needing to get to Level 2 before his left hand gets a Strength bonus, but its not too bad. In part I guess they've filled up the progression by giving virtually everyone some spells, or equivalent usage-limited powers.

jibbajibba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9098
"Dead" Levels
« Reply #168 on: August 10, 2015, 10:15:08 PM »
Quote from: Bloody Stupid Johnson;847966
Well I concluded you can't make everyone happy.

As well as the people who want a pony every level and the people who don't care one way or the other, its clear there are people who actually don't want stuff every level. Some of them specifically to piss in my Cheerios, but in among the old school flapdoodle there's a mostly legit complaint that in order to give someone a special ability every level, requires a game have a complexity above a certain level i.e. in most cases to give someone an ability to do something there has to be a rule that without that ability, they can't do it.

Admittedly 5E IMHO actually isn't too bad for this (rulings not rules and all that), there are a few places where they've stolen a basic ability and sold it back at an exorbitant rate like your ranger needing to get to Level 2 before his left hand gets a Strength bonus, but its not too bad. In part I guess they've filled up the progression by giving virtually everyone some spells, or equivalent usage-limited powers.


one of the problems with D&D's class model going right back to the introduction of theives and rangers is that there is a belief that every new class needs its own cool powerz and you need a class for every niche character idea.

So they could have introduced a tracking skill and you could get that skill as a fighter if you sold out something else, say access to heavy armour. Then you could have rangers without the need to generate a slew of new stuff for the new class thet then meant you needed a slew of new stuff for fighters to keep them at parity.

So the complaint about complexity growing out of too many class abilities is really one about too many classes with too many abilities more than it being about needing dead levels to prevent characters getting too complex.

I much prefer a simpler common pool of rather mundane powers and skills PCs can dip into as they level. 5E manages this approach with Feats rather well I think.

Add to this unique powers for individual PCs that come from the game world and i think you have the perfect mix.
All barbarians turning into bears at 8th level is no where near as evocative as your own Barbarian developing the abilty to turn into a bear as a gift for completing a quest for his bear spirit guide.

I know encouraging DMs to think outside the box, use their imagination and innovate is a litle radical and detracts from a clean corporate product but I am fairly sure you could wrap some rules round "Developing Unique Powers for PCs" as part of the DMG advice.
No longer living in Singapore
Method Actor-92% :Tactician-75% :Storyteller-67%:
Specialist-67% :Power Gamer-42% :Butt-Kicker-33% :
Casual Gamer-8%


GAMERS Profile
Jibbajibba
9AA788 -- Age 45 -- Academia 1 term, civilian 4 terms -- $15,000

Cult&Hist-1 (Anthropology); Computing-1; Admin-1; Research-1;
Diplomacy-1; Speech-2; Writing-1; Deceit-1;
Brawl-1 (martial Arts); Wrestling-1; Edged-1;

Moracai

  • SeƱor Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
"Dead" Levels
« Reply #169 on: August 11, 2015, 03:18:01 AM »
Quote from: jibbajibba;847989
I know encouraging DMs to think outside the box, use their imagination and innovate is a litle radical and detracts from a clean corporate product but I am fairly sure you could wrap some rules round "Developing Unique Powers for PCs" as part of the DMG advice.


Well put!

Omega

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • O
  • Posts: 17093
"Dead" Levels
« Reply #170 on: August 11, 2015, 07:01:29 AM »
Quote from: Bloody Stupid Johnson;847966
Well I concluded you can't make everyone happy.


Its worse than that.

Even if you filled up every level there would be those who can and will bitch that some aspect isnt a "real" level filler.