SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

A working definition of the OSR

Started by RPGPundit, October 11, 2014, 03:17:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

RPGPundit

OSR: a design philosophy of creating systems, settings and adventures that fit within the boundaries of old-school mechanics and concepts; that is, either directly utilizing features that were in existence in the period before the advent of 2nd edition AD&D; or features that, in spite of not having historically existed at that time, could have existed in that period without the addition of material or design concepts that are clearly the product of subsequent ideas or later theories.
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you\'ve played \'medieval fantasy\' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

danbuter

OSR: Derivative clones of early D&D. Any other result is just some lame ass trying to hijack the name for sales.
Sword and Board - My blog about BFRPG, S&W, Hi/Lo Heroes, and other games.
Sword & Board: BFRPG Supplement Free pdf. Cheap print version.
Bushi D6  Samurai and D6!
Bushi setting map

Piestrio

Quote from: danbuter;791324OSR: Derivative clones of early D&D. Any other result is just some lame ass trying to hijack the name for sales.

Ditto.

OSR is old D&D and it's imitators.
Disclaimer: I attach no moral weight to the way you choose to pretend to be an elf.

Currently running: The Great Pendragon Campaign & DC Adventures - Timberline
Currently Playing: AD&D

Omega

I thought one designers take on it was bemusing.

"OOP Stolen Repeatedly" Due to the plethora of bootlegs out there now under the guise of OSR.

Another one was "3rd ed...Again, and again and again and again..." Due to the plethora of OSR using the 3rd ed tentpole excuse.

Which ignores the much more valid works of people producing actual original material like modules and setting books.

I dont think there will ever be a viable definition now because as usual in the gaming biz. People are using it for things that arent.

jeff37923

Quote from: danbuter;791324OSR: Derivative clones of early D&D. Any other result is just some lame ass trying to hijack the name for sales.

Quote from: Piestrio;791326Ditto.

OSR is old D&D and it's imitators.

Yeah.

It may not be what we want from OSR, but that is what it has turned in to.
"Meh."

TristramEvans

O.S.R. - "A brief renaissance of interest in early D&D playstyles, game mechanics, and aesthetics that grew out of an already existing renaissance of older game systems being "cloned" and made available online in the late 90s and early aughts. Cloning early editions of D&D gained a measure of legitimacy following the release of the OGL with the publication of D&D "3rd edition" by WoTC, with Castles & Crusades the forerunner of the online movement originating with OSRIC. The renaissance ended shortly after people started referring to it as a renaissance, as this, like any other sort of positive declaration online, led to a morass of whinging, bitching, and pedanticism that killed any goodwill or interest from the public at large."

talysman

Definition's too wordy, tries to be too precise, and contains errors. All the OSR is is a bunch of people rebelling against modern D&D and often, by extension, other new games. What they in general reject is system-first game design.

Or, since you love to hate Ron Edwards, how about I explain it in terms that would enfuriate Ron Edwards? Ron hates D&D, Ron hates "simulationism". The OSR rejects the trend towards "gamist and narrativist priorities" in D&D and tries to restore simulationism. That's why Ronn made his recent dismissive comments about the OSR being just a marketing term. It galls him that people would want to fill blog posts with random tables of door types or monster motivations, or rant about the uselessness of game balance, or embrace "rulings, not rules" play styles.

TristramEvans

Quote from: talysman;791342Definition's too wordy, tries to be too precise, and contains errors. All the OSR is is a bunch of people rebelling against modern D&D and often, by extension, other new games. What they in general reject is system-first game design.

Or, since you love to hate Ron Edwards, how about I explain it in terms that would enfuriate Ron Edwards? Ron hates D&D, Ron hates "simulationism". The OSR rejects the trend towards "gamist and narrativist priorities" in D&D and tries to restore simulationism. That's why Ronn made his recent dismissive comments about the OSR being just a marketing term. It galls him that people would want to fill blog posts with random tables of door types or monster motivations, or rant about the uselessness of game balance, or embrace "rulings, not rules" play styles.

Ron hates Simulationism  or Simulationism doesn't really exist? Ron should make up his mind.

Gunslinger

Original Simulated Repeated
Old Souls Rejoicing
Oops Shoddy Remembrance
Oh Shit Raped
 

JeremyR

Material based around TSR era D&D/AD&D.

I don't see why 2e should be excluded. I don't like everything done in it, but it's largely a clean up of 1e and is probably 95% compatible. Indeed, early 2e products had a thing on the cover saying they still work with 1e.

I don't think there is anything in 2e that wasn't in 1e, except I guess how specialist mages work, casting a subset of spells rather than being a whole separate class. NWPs were in Gygax's own OA (he didn't write it, but claimed copyright ownership of it)

talysman

Quote from: JeremyR;791365Material based around TSR era D&D/AD&D.

I don't see why 2e should be excluded. I don't like everything done in it, but it's largely a clean up of 1e and is probably 95% compatible. Indeed, early 2e products had a thing on the cover saying they still work with 1e.

I don't think there is anything in 2e that wasn't in 1e, except I guess how specialist mages work, casting a subset of spells rather than being a whole separate class. NWPs were in Gygax's own OA (he didn't write it, but claimed copyright ownership of it)

In Pundit's defense, I don't think he's excluding 2e. He says an OSR game must be designed with mechanics that existed prior to 2e, or that could have existed prior to 2e. Unless there's something in 2e that's clearly not possible pre-2e, 2e must qualify.

TristramEvans

What defines a mechanic that "couldn't exist"?

jhkim

Quote from: TristramEvans;791376What defines a mechanic that "couldn't exist"?
Yeah, I find that phrasing weird, especially with the timing of 2e in 1989. There were definitely mechanics that didn't exist yet in 1989, but couldn't exist?

By 1989, Dragonlance was already well under way, and there were plenty of games that put story at the forefront. Ars Magica has a rotating GM structure and player control of plot via Whimsy Cards. Prince Valiant also had such a structure. There were also plenty of dissociated mechanics-heavy systems that parallel the complaints about D&D4 - parts of Champions were probably the most well-known of these, but there were plenty of others.

Exploderwizard

I wouldn't limit OSR to D&D only. SWN and Mutant Future seem to fit in the OSR niche. There are probably others too.
Quote from: JonWakeGamers, as a whole, are much like primitive cavemen when confronted with a new game. Rather than \'oh, neat, what\'s this do?\', the reaction is to decide if it\'s a sex hole, then hit it with a rock.

Quote from: Old Geezer;724252At some point it seems like D&D is going to disappear up its own ass.

Quote from: Kyle Aaron;766997In the randomness of the dice lies the seed for the great oak of creativity and fun. The great virtue of the dice is that they come without boxed text.

jeff37923

Quote from: Exploderwizard;791390I wouldn't limit OSR to D&D only. SWN and Mutant Future seem to fit in the OSR niche. There are probably others too.

This is one of the things that galls me about the OSR moniker. Classic Traveller is obviously Old School, but is not embraced by the OSR. Stars Without Number is just Classic Traveller with D&D style characters & combat, but is lauded as one of the best OSR games in existence. WTF?
"Meh."