SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Why is Delta Green considered to be so good?

Started by Rezendevous, March 26, 2007, 10:33:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rezendevous

I like Delta Green and think it's an interesting setting for CoC, but I don't get why so many gamers seem to have such an intense thing for it and act like it's the best RPG product ever made.  The writing is very good, and the information for creating investigators from all these government agencies is really useful even for non-DG games.  But you know, it would be really easy to do something similar with another system or on one's own, and it's not like there aren't similar things available for other systems (Dark*Matter comes to mind; I know they are different but it's the same general idea).

I can understand liking it, since I do too, but I just don't understand the rabid devotion of some people towards it.  What gives?

stu2000

There have been a bunch of similar products, but the signal-to-noise ratio in DG is far higher than most. DG comprises a lot of material, some unusually good fiction, and a crunchy, robust new setting for a hoary old classic. The Cthulhu mythos is immersive and contagious, for the same reasons the government conspiracy mythos is addictive. They both worm into your brain and start coloring things you know, rewriting your braincode . . . Dammit--I've said too much! What's that sound? :eek:
Employment Counselor: So what do you like to do outside of work?
Oblivious Gamer: I like to play games: wargames, role-playing games.
EC: My cousin killed himself because of role-playing games.
OG: Jesus, what was he playing? Rifts?
--Fear the Boot

Caudex

I think it's also one of those things that seems obvious in hindsight but was still a big milestone in terms of development. A bit like the invention of the cat-flap.

CoC had been trucking along for years and then comes along DG and there's a whole lot of "Oh yeah, this is what we've been missing". A believable and robust campaign framework, as well as organisation and NPC write-ups designed to be interacted with and destroyed rather than left intact at all times (compare with oWoD canon NPCs, for example), were the main thing, I think. The high-quality adventures in the DG books and The Unspeakable Oath helped too.

In terms of design and atmosphere, I'd also say DG was a big step up from contemporary Chaosium books, which seems like a small thing but gets the Cthulhu Keeper cogs in your mind spinning.

jrients

It's got a bunch of guns and you get to play a rogue intelligence agent, so you can get away with carrying them.  All in the name of truth, justice, and stopping the Nyarlahotep plushies from taking over the local comic store.
Jeff Rients
My gameblog

jcfiala

Well, for one it's pretty well written.  For two, it does a nice job of matching up the Cthulhu Mythos with the alien conspiracy standards.  For Three, it gives you a reason to have a group of characters together, and a way to add in new characters once these die.  And finally, it's hard to find, so people want it real bad. :)
 

Ian Noble

Quote from: CaudexCoC had been trucking along for years and then comes along DG and there's a whole lot of "Oh yeah, this is what we've been missing". A believable and robust campaign framework, as well as organisation and NPC write-ups designed to be interacted with and destroyed rather than left intact at all times (compare with oWoD canon NPCs, for example), were the main thing, I think. The high-quality adventures in the DG books and The Unspeakable Oath helped too.

In terms of design and atmosphere, I'd also say DG was a big step up from contemporary Chaosium books, which seems like a small thing but gets the Cthulhu Keeper cogs in your mind spinning.

Bingo.

DG was a breath of fresh air.  Chaosium, up to that time, was trucking along with occasional new material but pretty much just reprinting previously published material from the '80s.  Boring.

 - Ian
My rules and comments about good GMing:
  • Improvise as much as you can
  • A character sheet is a list of items that tell you what the story should be about
  • As a GM, say "maybe" and ask your players to justify a "yes"
  • Immersion isn\'t a dirty word.  
  • Collectively, players are smarter than you and will think of things you never considered.