why should your selfish desire to breed into an already overpopulated world require someone else to censor their content?
But the world isn't over-populated
It certainly is - for the way we treat our non-renewable resources. And even more so the renewable ones if we're being honest (looking at the forest situation). The current way is not maintainable and we are already seeing the first shortages. Thinking that things will turn out well just because they luckily did in the past is naive.
It is a very uneven issue, though, as we have the West with its shrinking population while by far consuming the most resources (per capita) AND having ever-growing life expectancy (increasing the duration of per-capita consumption even more) and east Asia with even lower birth rates, but also somewhat less per capita consumption.
There are growing regions, such as Latin America, Africa or India - but even there, the fertility rates of over 2.0 are shrinking and might reach 2.0 or lower sooner or later. And of course, those regions have a reduced life expectancy.
I don't think there's any real danger from it getting even worse and at least at the moment, it seems to be reaching some sort of equilibrium globally.
There are certainly problems stemming from that, such as most societies having been built on the illusion that there will always be more kids than old people (if that were true, we'd indeed be strongly overpopulated or get there extremely soon) - will be interesting to see which nations will be able to change enough to deal with the new reality.
Either way, though, taking any of that as reason not to have children is idiotic. If you want kids, go have kids.
If you don't want kids, don't have 'em.
Nobody is helped by people having kids who don't want them or the other way around. Having children SHOULD be selfishly motivated.
There's certainly no duty to procreate on a planet that could easily have 1-2 billion less of us around and would still be more than fine.
Likewise, the situation is not so dire that anyone should feel pressured to not have kids.
From my experience, people who put overall population up as the first reason they don't have kids are just looking for excuses for not wanting to raise children.
Which is absurd, as not wanting to raise children is nothing that needs excusing - we're all different and you'll always have 10-30% that don't want it (in the past, they just had to anyway for various reasons).
Plus there are other ways to contribute to society and I'd even argue the only duty when it comes to society is not actively doing harm to it.
What any of this has to do with LGBTQ, I don't really know, but this has been derailing from the very start, so why not proceed in that direction