SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Which sex starts the conversations and when?

Started by riprock, October 06, 2007, 11:13:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

riprock

This is completely unscientific and based solely from amateur observation:

Women seem to initiate a lot of conversations with men who are known to be part of the woman's community, but not personally known to the woman.  When a man is not known to be part of the community, the average women seems to avoid starting conversations.

By contrast, men seem to be willing to start conversations with any woman, regardless of kinship/having-been-introduced/community membership.

Theory: Women think in terms of social networks, kinship groups, best-friends-forever-clubs, etc., more than men do.  Women *also* like to forage more than men do.  They like looking at basically recognizable but individually unfamiliar things, and judging the qualities thereof.  

And all of the above could well be completely wrong.
"By their way of thinking, gold and experience goes[sic] much further when divided by one. Such shortsighted individuals are quick to stab their fellow players in the back if they think it puts them ahead. They see the game solely as a contest between themselves and their fellow players.  How sad.  Clearly the game is a contest between the players and the GM.  Any contest against your fellow party members is secondary." Hackmaster Player\'s Handbook

Koltar

Just remember any rult that you (or anyone else) makes up , there will be plenty of exceptions.

 Plus I don't think gender differences on things like that mean as much as they used to . In my circle of friends & co-workers, I know a woman who was in the military for many years, at least 4 bisexual women, two couples who are into BDSM culture, maybe 5 to 6 pagans/Wiccans, 1 metrosexual World of Darkness Storyteller,  and maybe at least 1 Log Cabin Republican....oh yeah there is the perky Christian Goth and her husband.

Who starts the conversations ? - It all depends on who feels like talking first and who doesn't...and if flirting might be involved.

- Ed C.
The return of \'You can\'t take the Sky From me!\'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUn-eN8mkDw&feature=rec-fresh+div

This is what a really cool FANTASY RPG should be like :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-WnjVUBDbs

Still here, still alive, at least Seven years now...

beejazz

Odd... I see the social circle thing as being maybe reversed... or something.

I myself tend to favor a tighter group of closer friends... with maybe a nebulous infinity outside of that composed of forgettable acquaintances. The women I know tend to have a larger group of more distant friends... and I'm not sure how they interact outside of that, because it gets hard for me to judge who is and is not a member of that group.

Just remember that gender roles are pretty nebulous, with plenty of subdivisions between them. For every ares there's a hermes, and for every aphrodite an athena... as terrible as that looks in print.