Forum > Media and Inspiration

[Thunderdome Thread #1] JimBobOz is a prick

(1/5) > >>

Kyle Aaron:
Since droog and jdrakeh seem so keen to have a go at me, and are derailing other threads to do so, I thought I'd open a new thread to give them a chance to really stick the boot in.

Bring it on. That way you won't have to be off-topic in other threads.

Plus, you know, anyone else who wants to have a go. Jdrakeh said I had "a messiah complex". droog once called me a "mountebank", which I thought was just a character class in old Rolemaster, but there you go. Surely there are some others?

So, come on. I'm ready to rock.

As you give, so shall you receive.

jdrakeh:

--- Quote from: JimBobOz ---That way you won't have to be off-topic in other threads.
--- End quote ---


I'm not off topic in the other thread. I'm afraid you'll have to play with yourself here. I'm sure you'll manage just fine :rolleyes:

Silverlion:
You know I tell you "to your face" (as in as much as I can on the internet) what I think.

However I'll be explicitly clear:

I think you sometimes are a bit self oriented--you seem to desire (to great extent) feedback on things you work on. I understand this desire, I sometimes want it too, but you seem to expect it. To the point of demanding it.

Not my bag really.

I think sometimes you come across as a bully online, you may not be one but when you go out of your way to find people to mock, and or disagree with--I wonder what the kind of life you lead to not have better things to do...

Do I dislike you? Not really, I don't care enough to dislike you, heck I think you've got good ideas from time to time, but sometimes the delivery of those ideas is so tied up in self-oriented focus that the idea gets lost.

*shrugs*

We all have flaws though, sometimes we see them, sometimes we don't.

jdrakeh:

--- Quote from: Silverlion ---You know I tell you "to your face" (as in as much as I can on the internet) what I think.
--- End quote ---


I assume that you're talking to me, but to be clear. . . I didn't go looking for this argument. I call 'em as I see 'em. In the thread in question I dismissed game theory in general as largely self-indulgent bunk (as Kyle has frequently done where all theories other than Cheetoism are concerned) not just Cheetoism.

It was Kyle who stooped to the adhominem attacks, taking things to a personal level. He took what I said personally, but it wasn't intended that way (I guess I can see why that came across the way that it did, as he has firmly entrenched hismelf as his theory -- but that's hardly my fault). I attacked the idea, not the person behind it (well, initially).

At any rate, Thunderdome isn't for me. I don't have anything to prove, I said my piece (on-topic) elsewhere, and that's that. Game theory is largely bunk. If people want to subscribe, that's great. If they don't, that's fine too. I don't think they're obligated to hang on my every word. I love it when they do, of course, but if they don't. . . OH WELL.

[Note: This post is a response to Silverlion, not a response to Kyle. Again, that's not a game I'll be playing.]

Silverlion:

--- Quote from: jdrakeh ---I assume that you're talking to me, but to be clear.  
--- End quote ---

Nope I was talking to Jim Bob. Since his name is in the OP/thread title.  Sorry Heck. :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version