SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Red Letter Media predicts awful time travel story in Rise of Skywalker.

Started by Ratman_tf, July 26, 2019, 12:22:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ratman_tf



[video=youtube_share;gzeOrA2in1c]https://youtu.be/gzeOrA2in1c[/youtube]

It's a good argument. The round dish on the Falcon is a pretty big tell, IMO.

I just can't wait until the sequel trilogy is finished. I think it was a terrible mistake, and the stand alone films have been, if not great, at least better.
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

Omega

Who knows.

They may have just changed it because they really dont give a fuck about continuity. Oh wait. They dont give a fuck.

Whats the next movie going to be? Fucked up.

But Rey will probably kill Kylo. Maybee it will be revealed she is a genderswap clone of Luke or Anakin? Would explain alot.

Mankcam

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1097107I just can't wait until the sequel trilogy is finished. I think it was a terrible mistake, and the stand alone films have been, if not great, at least better.
Well I agree with you on this point. The Sequels feel like a bunch of art students writing a mish mash of fanfiction, and no one reigning them in.
Rogue One and Solo have run rings around the Sequels, and at least feel like they belong to Star Wars canon.

jeff37923

Quote from: Ratman_tf;1097107I just can't wait until the sequel trilogy is finished. I think it was a terrible mistake, and the stand alone films have been, if not great, at least better.

I had high hopes and am still a Star Wars fan, but while I can watch Solo and Rogue One and Star Wars Rebels over and over, I sold my copy of The Last Jedi because I hated it more every time I watched it.
"Meh."

Warboss Squee

Rebels was clearly aimed at a younger audience than Clone Wars, and not nearly as good or nuanced.

deadDMwalking

I think there's a lesson here for any type of world building (especially germane to RPGs).  Fans can accept a lot of things that are fantastic or magical, but it's important to maintain consistency.  If everything is 'rule of cool' and things that are well established are overturned/rejected by new developments, it's hard to believe that the setting matters.

One of the reasons why Tolkien set the standard for fantasy for the last century is that he had a well-developed world; the stories seemed to flow from it in a deeply plausible way.  You can have fun with a shallower setting; you can even have fans, but it's hard to really love a setting that gets 'reset' in major ways all the time.
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

jeff37923

Quote from: Warboss Squee;1097491Rebels was clearly aimed at a younger audience than Clone Wars, and not nearly as good or nuanced.

Maybe, but it is hard to see the trials of Kanan Jarus right up to his death scene and say that it wasn't good.
"Meh."

Spinachcat

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1097514Fans can accept a lot of things that are fantastic or magical, but it's important to maintain consistency.  If everything is 'rule of cool' and things that are well established are overturned/rejected by new developments, it's hard to believe that the setting matters.

Exactly. The New Trek movies made the same mistake.

Armchair Gamer

I can see TRoS going in all sorts of different directions. The ones I think are most likely are a) universalizing Force access or otherwise replacing the old light/dark duality with some sort of hamfisted 'unity', and/or b) going back to the Mortis arc of Clone Wars and ending up with Luke replacing the 'Father', Kylo the 'Son' and Rey the 'Daughter.'

jeff37923

Quote from: Armchair Gamer;1097654I can see TRoS going in all sorts of different directions. The ones I think are most likely are a) universalizing Force access or otherwise replacing the old light/dark duality with some sort of hamfisted 'unity', and/or b) going back to the Mortis arc of Clone Wars and ending up with Luke replacing the 'Father', Kylo the 'Son' and Rey the 'Daughter.'

I really hope that they do not link it back to the Mortis trilogy because that would just make The Force seem too much like some kind of Post-Modern Catholicism for my taste.

I also really hope that they do not engage in time travel bullshit, even though it is apparently now canon. Time travel was needed to save the Star Trek franchise from its own overconvoluted canon (not to mention its fanbase) and JJ Abrams is a hero for doing so, but it would shitwreck Star Wars.
"Meh."

deadDMwalking

Quote from: jeff37923;1097695Time travel was needed to save the Star Trek franchise from its own overconvoluted canon (not to mention its fanbase) and JJ Abrams is a hero for doing so, but it would shitwreck Star Wars.

I disagree with this quite strongly.  It shitwrecked Star Trek.  

Time Travel always had a place in Star Trek, and the TV series Enterprise made maintaining that continuum a central theme.  Some things, like Tasha Yarr traveling back in time to have a heroic moment were both surprising and kinda cool - they gave a much better send-off to the character than a pile of evil goo ever could.  But having a disaffected miner coming back and destroying Vulcan is super-dumb.
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

Ratman_tf

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1097710I disagree with this quite strongly.  It shitwrecked Star Trek.  

Time Travel always had a place in Star Trek, and the TV series Enterprise made maintaining that continuum a central theme.  Some things, like Tasha Yarr traveling back in time to have a heroic moment were both surprising and kinda cool - they gave a much better send-off to the character than a pile of evil goo ever could.  But having a disaffected miner coming back and destroying Vulcan is super-dumb.

Huh. This does make me wonder, is Picard set in the Abramsverse or the original timeline? Does it even matter at this point?
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

deadDMwalking

Probably not.  I imagine Picard-verse uses the timeline that Next Generation used.  There were no Vulcans among the main characters, so it might not be readily apparent the way it would be with Voyager (Tuvok), at least if I'm remembering correctly that with Vulcan destroyed there are not other Vulcans around.  

So, this might sound like I'm nerding out really bad, but I also had a problem with Alternate Spock (Nimoy) coming and telling New Spock to let Kirk be in charge.  I somehow read one Star Trek comic (probably at a Doctor's Office) and there was a thing about two Kirks arguing over determining the fate of the universe.  Alternate reality Kirk insisted that he needed to decide, and normal Kirk didn't let him.  In the end, making his own choice was the RIGHT ONE.  Taking the advice of alternate universe people seems contrary to the generally established principles in Star Trek that you should do what you think is right.
When I say objectively, I mean \'subjectively\'.  When I say literally, I mean \'figuratively\'.  
And when I say that you are a horse\'s ass, I mean that the objective truth is that you are a literal horse\'s ass.

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all. - Peter Drucker

Ratman_tf

Quote from: deadDMwalking;1097715So, this might sound like I'm nerding out really bad, but I also had a problem with Alternate Spock (Nimoy) coming and telling New Spock to let Kirk be in charge.  I somehow read one Star Trek comic (probably at a Doctor's Office) and there was a thing about two Kirks arguing over determining the fate of the universe.  Alternate reality Kirk insisted that he needed to decide, and normal Kirk didn't let him.  In the end, making his own choice was the RIGHT ONE.  Taking the advice of alternate universe people seems contrary to the generally established principles in Star Trek that you should do what you think is right.

I think the main problem running through the first two nuTreks (I coulnd't finish the third, it was so boring.) is that they were heavily borrowing from original Trek. Not storylines or characters, but the zeitgeist, the essence of these characters that had existed since the late 60's, through the animated series and six feature films. The new movies set themselves before the original series, but expected us to treat the setting and characters through the lens of having already done the establishing work. For example,  Khan from the new movie. He's a nothing character with no backstory or build up, and yet the movie treats him as some kind of big deal. Spock sheds a tear at Kirk's death, but they did hardly any work to build up their friendship. The Abrams Trek universe is all flash and no substance.

So your example of original Spock telling new Spock to let Kirk be in charge is a great example of that. They won't do the work of having Kirk earn Spock's respect, they just have old Spock tell him to do it.
The notion of an exclusionary and hostile RPG community is a fever dream of zealots who view all social dynamics through a narrow keyhole of structural oppression.
-Haffrung

Warboss Squee

Quote from: jeff37923;1097537Maybe, but it is hard to see the trials of Kanan Jarus right up to his death scene and say that it wasn't good.

I would trumpet Rebels from the rooftops if it had been about Kanan. My issue was that to much 5 me was spent on Ezra, to the detriment of the other characters. Even Zeb and Sabine's major arcs revolved around Ezra.