That's a horrible review. I own the book, and I GMed the game a couple of times (yes, throw your rotten fruits already), but what this bozo has done and ad-hoc houseruled had in the only shallow resemblance to the Sorcerer rules.
Sergio's spot on in many points (like the tacked-on advice that has fuck all to do with S&S, or Destiny that dangles around without any connection to the system, or the derivative nature of exemplaric settings and PCs), but there are so many factual errors that it insults my craftperson's pride as a reviewer.
From the review alone, he doesn't sound to me like someone on the war on swine. The focus on the fluff-y parts, the extensive search for thematic points (civilization vs barbarism), the use of references to LeGuin essays, the lamentation about the shallow character creation and the extremely free-wheeling system use looks to me more like the handwriting of a typical WW storyteller, than that of a typical user here on theRPGsite.
Maybe it looks a bit elsewise if I read the RPG.net discussion thread, but as of now, I'd stand to my evaluation.
BTW, I had no trouble with the language, it was more the content that made me read in a slow pace. (What might have to do with the fact that I'm not a native speaker and therefore not that perceptive towards bad wording, grammar mistakes etc.)