SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

3D movie +1D characters = bad movie.

Started by Cylonophile, April 09, 2010, 08:29:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Cylonophile

April 09, 2010, 08:29:14 PM
So, hollywood's going into a new 3D craze now.

My opinion on it is they'd be better if they concentrated on 3D stories and characters instead of 3D filming.

a 3D movie with 1D characters and a flat story will still be a bad movie. A 2D movie with 3D characters and plots will be better.
Go an\' tell me I\'m ignored.
Kick my sad ass off the board,
I don\'t care, I\'m still free.
You can\'t take the net from me.

-The ballad of browncoatone, after his banning by the communist dictators of rpg.net for refusing to obey their arbitrary decrees.

jeff37923

#1
April 09, 2010, 11:14:00 PM
Quote from: Cylonophile;372703So, hollywood's going into a new 3D craze now.

My opinion on it is they'd be better if they concentrated on 3D stories and characters instead of 3D filming.

a 3D movie with 1D characters and a flat story will still be a bad movie. A 2D movie with 3D characters and plots will be better.

Problem is that what has been the current Hollywood logic for awhile now is that if you spend the money on special effects what you could have spent on the scrpt, you will get people into theaters. Latest case-in-point for this has been the Clash of the Titans remake.
"Meh."

StormBringer

#2
April 10, 2010, 02:39:54 AM
Quote from: Cylonophile;372703a 3D movie with 1D characters and a flat story will still be a bad movie.
How can it be?  That's almost 4 D's!
If you read the above post, you owe me $20 for tutoring fees

\'Let them call me rebel, and welcome, I have no concern for it, but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul.\'
- Thomas Paine
\'Everything doesn\'t need

Hairfoot

#3
April 10, 2010, 06:01:14 AM
Quote from: Cylonophile;372703they'd be better if they concentrated on 3D stories and characters instead of 3D filming.

Yeah, Alice sucked.

Bedrockbrendan

#4
April 10, 2010, 09:26:49 AM
Actually, for me, I don't want a 3d script or 3d characters if the film is 3d. I just want a bunch of cool visuals about 2 hours. If the characters and script are fully fleshed out and interesting, I would rather watch it in 2d (3d is just too distracting and makes it harder for me to enjoy a good movie).
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions