Obviously, it was a horrible travesty to the free speech principle of the forum, that Mythusmage was banned. We after all, have no proof he ever did any of the actions he advocated, furthermore, a lot of posters speak about illegal actions such as drugs, which obviously means that merely discussing an illegal act should not be reason for banning. Should paedophilia apologists be silenced rather than debated in the community?
You may think that banning a paedophile (apologist) was fine, but I implore you - consider this, every minute this travesty of justice occurs, a college kid hangs a Che Guevara poster.
Quote from: Rincewind1;947075Obviously, it was a horrible travesty to the free speech principle of the forum, that Mythusmage was banned. We after all, have no proof he ever did any of the actions he advocated, furthermore, a lot of posters speak about illegal actions such as drugs, which obviously means that merely discussing an illegal act should not be reason for banning. Should paedophilia apologists be silenced rather than debated in the community?
You may think that banning a paedophile (apologist) was fine, but I implore you - consider this, every minute this travesty of justice occurs, a college kid hangs a Che Guevara poster.
,
Was Mythusmage actually banned for violating his Nambla-like Topic Ban? I thought it was something else that got him banned.
Quote from: CRKrueger;947077,
Was Mythusmage actually banned for violating his Nambla-like Topic Ban? I thought it was something else that got him banned.
I hope so, because otherwise I might be literally hoisted by my own petard, and he could come back ;).
BTW, if you're working your way up to a frothing Free Speech Flameout Ban over this, do it right. Post an iframe from Stormfront, some hot porn and invoke the Name That Shall Not Be Named. :D
Quote from: CRKrueger;947079BTW, if you're working your way up to a frothing Free Speech Flameout Ban over this, do it right. Post an iframe from Stormfront, some hot porn and invoke the Name That Shall Not Be Named. :D
BT?
If you mean my ban - come on, obviously I like this place, or else I'd just leave, not give even slightest damn about it.
I'm pretty sure that Rincewind is somehow trying to compare Milo Yiannopoulos to Mythusmage in this case.
The big problem with that is that Milo was talking about his experiences as a 17 year old moving in with a 29 year old boyfriend, while Mythusmage was talking about his awesome rpg world where it's totally cool to fuck 9 year olds.
But furthermore, Mythusmage wasn't actually banned for being a pedo, or for expressing support for man-preteen love in fantasy worlds. He was banned because he couldn't shut up about it.
As much as I admire Milo and most of what he's done, if Milo should ever come to theRPGsite and not be able to shut up about his RPG where you play slightly-jailbait English twinks in a neverending quest for Mature Black Cock, I would ban him too.
Quote from: CRKrueger;947079BTW, if you're working your way up to a frothing Free Speech Flameout Ban over this, do it right. Post an iframe from Stormfront, some hot porn and invoke the Name That Shall Not Be Named. :D
which name is that?
Quote from: Tristram Evans;947146which name is that?
It can't be named. :D
Quote from: CRKrueger;947239It can't be named. :D
but surely it could be hinted at. at first I was thinking it was pundit's name, but since he uses that quite freely on google+ I cant imagine why it'd be verboten.
Quote from: Tristram Evans;947276but surely it could be hinted at. at first I was thinking it was pundit's name, but since he uses that quite freely on google+ I cant imagine why it'd be verboten.
I'm pretty sure that's a pseudonym.
So when will be this transgression of justice amended?