This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: Policy Change Consideration  (Read 2430 times)

el-remmen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • e
  • Posts: 264
    • http://www.aquerra.com/rbdmc/index.php
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2006, 09:59:26 PM »
This is certainly nothing to be bent out of shape about.

It's all good, everybody.  :D
Check out the "Out of the Frying Pan" D&D Aquerra Story Hour (Now with Session by Session DM Commentary!)

"Just because you're buff, don't play tough, 'cause I'll reverse the Earth and turn your flesh back to dust. . ."

BOZ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • B
  • Posts: 452
    • http://www.enworld.org/cc/
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2006, 10:03:30 PM »
when i ran a pbp a couple years ago, i got more PMs in a 2-month span than i had ever received on all forums combined previously.  yes, that big PM box will help.  ;)
don't quote me on that.  :)

Visit the Creature Catalog for all your D&D 3E monster needs!  :)

Zalmoxis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 595
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2006, 10:18:39 PM »
I like both ideas, Pooka.

Reefer Madness

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2006, 12:12:43 AM »
agreed, go with it mang
Turning all of our children into hooligans and whores its Reefer Madness.
Anti-wrinkle cream there may be, but anti-fat-bastard cream there is not.  -Dave

Aelfinn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • A
  • Posts: 193
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2006, 12:46:10 AM »
i'd run with it and see how it goes. if it works well, then keep it around. if not, ditch it.
Bedd Ann ap lleian ymnewais fynydd  
Iluagor Llew Ymrais
Prif ddewin merddin Embrai
[/SIZE][/I]

Hreidmar

  • Guest
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #20 on: March 06, 2006, 12:48:40 AM »
Quote from: Aelfinn
i'd run with it and see how it goes. if it works well, then keep it around. if not, ditch it.


Troll thinks this little might actual have good idea.

Megamieuwsel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • M
  • Posts: 139
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2006, 10:40:31 AM »
I think both ideas have a lot of merit.

And for those  , "complaining" about the postcount of Game-masters ; Easy fix : GMs and players both use an Alt for their PBP-game.
So : No postcount-surge because of PBP.

Not that I mind : I'm not my postcount. Are you?

Janos

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • J
  • Posts: 90
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #22 on: March 06, 2006, 11:08:38 AM »
Excellent ideas.  I'd also allow signatures for alt-IDs for PbEM in case they want to anontate something consistently, like current hits, ongoing bonuses or buffs, or even link back to their character sheet if a PbEM thread gets cluttered.
 

Reefer Madness

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Policy Change Consideration
« Reply #23 on: March 06, 2006, 07:31:57 PM »
very good Ideas, Give the gm and players special accounts that have everything turned on, avatars for character pics, sigs for different information such as description or other important info....

I would aslo give the GM's mod status for their game sections...
Turning all of our children into hooligans and whores its Reefer Madness.
Anti-wrinkle cream there may be, but anti-fat-bastard cream there is not.  -Dave