Making comments without allowing for right of reply and then blocking the thread.

[TrippyHippy]

Answer the question, or you'll be banned for site disruption.

Go to hell, I said. I'm not giving you a platform to continue your political propaganda and lies. Save it for your own abortion of a subforum - don't you even know the rules of your own site?!

You will be banning me for exactly the same reason as before: politicised censorship. It's other people's ideas you hate, and you want to control your own political narrative by surrounding yourself in sycophants and morons who don't mind going along with your views, regardless. The only reason you've ever allowed other people into your site is in the conceit that you are a 'champion of free speech' as part of an inferiority complex about RPG.net, and you are arrogant enough to think that they can be just worn down and beaten into submission by you're own machismo and that of your lickspittle dogs. You threaten me now with banning because it is too 'disruptive' to have anybody that challenges that illusion.  

"You'll get banned". That's really all you've got left isn't it?

Well, you missed the context of this entire transcript again, haven't you? You think I'd want to carry on posting on this worthless site?!

To think I ever defended you against charges of being a Nazi! You are a liar, a coward, a hypocrite, a racist, a misogynist, a bigot, a fantasist, a narcissist, a loudmouth and a fool. Are you a Nazi? Well no, technically as you weren't a member of that party. What label to give you then is up to you but, whatever you are, I've shit better things out with a stomach upset.

You want to ban me? Too late, I've left already, you tool.

[Doom]

Well, one can certainly hope that's the end of it.

Pundy, please realize you're dealing with a mental disorder here. These people can be pitied...but can't be argued with rationally.

[RPGPundit]

Go to hell, I said. I'm not giving you a platform to continue your political propaganda and lies. Save it for your own abortion of a subforum - don't you even know the rules of your own site?!

You will be banning me for exactly the same reason as before: politicised censorship.

Nope, I'll be banning you for refusing to answer a direct moderator question, to ascertain your motivation for posting the picture you did.

Last chance, Bitch.

[Headless]

Did Trippy change his tag line?  I don't think so.  I think you did that Pundit.  I might be wrong.  But if you did that you need to make clear those are your words not his.  Forcing him to say what you want, is worse than banning him or restricting what he can say.  

Its attached to everyone of his posts.

Also preventing people from speaking who won't say what you want is censorship.

[Doom]

Did Trippy change his tag line?  I don't think so.  I think you did that Pundit.  I might be wrong.  But if you did that you need to make clear those are your words not his.  Forcing him to say what you want, is worse than banning him or restricting what he can say.  

Its attached to everyone of his posts.

Also preventing people from speaking who won't say what you want is censorship.

Yeah, and we know how strongly Trippy feels about mis-attributing quotes the person involved probably never said, too.

That said, to be fair, your answer options are a bit loaded there, Pundy. I agree with you that many European leaders had effectively destroyed their countries by allowing in an invasion force, but there is more than one answer to your question beyond the two answers you've provided...but perhaps a different thread for that.

[TrippyHippy]

I didn't change it. Its more of Pundit's lies, and a cheap shot that demonstrates, yet again, his own lack of integrity.

As is pretending that he can construct a framed, red herring question as some contrived reason for banning, merely to perpetuate his arguments and provide a face-saving smokescreen against the truth. To address those loaded questions:

The image was originally posted because it challenged Pundit's political assertion that "hordes of savages that descended on Europe at Frau Merkel's invitation". It challenged this narrative for the simple reason that European leaders were responding to a humanitarian crisis and indeed, and that photo was a direct influence on the decisions made. The same point has been made in all those media outlets, around the world, who published it before:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/31/alan-kurdi-death-canada-refugee-policy-syria-boy-beach-turkey-photo

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/if-these-extraordinarily-powerful-images-of-a-dead-syrian-child-washed-up-on-a-beach-don-t-change-10482757.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/02/a-dead-baby-becomes-the-most-tragic-symbol-yet-of-the-mediterranean-refugee-crisis/?tid=a_mcntx&utm_term=.bc4b5591f78a

http://time.com/4162306/alan-kurdi-syria-drowned-boy-refugee-crisis/

The point of whether the child is representative of adult asylum seekers is irrelevant and misleading. The point was that the image was censored because Pundit disagreed with what the photo stood for, politically. It was a politically motivated decision to censor it, and it is a lie to claim it wasn't seeing that he openly stated this fact on this very thread.

Oh, and its interesting to see how people react when they think you've posted your last post. The old grave-dancing act never gets old. Doom, it looks like you could lose some weight.

[jeff37923]

So, whoever is left from TrippyHippy, Nexus, and Voros; what was the point of this little melodrama that you three have enacted? What were you three trying to achieve?

[S'mon]

The image was originally posted because it challenged Pundit's political assertion that "hordes of savages that descended on Europe at Frau Merkel's invitation". It challenged this narrative for the simple reason that European leaders were responding to a humanitarian crisis and indeed, and that photo was a direct influence on the decisions made.

The staged picture (the Turkish photographer admitted he'd staged it, though it was already obvious to anyone who's seen a drowning victim IRL) certainly was a direct influence on the decisions made. It created the media hysteria that enabled Merkel to open the floodgates and drown Europe in the very "hordes of savages that descended on Europe at Frau Merkel's invitation". The picture came first, a thousand women assaulted and raped by Merkel's horde at Cologne train station came 6 months later.

So your use of the picture was mendacious and I can see why you've successfully triggered Pundit so badly.

Edit: I can hardly believe I'm arguing over in Pundit Forum that Trippy shouldn't be banned... c'est la vie...

[TrippyHippy]

The staged picture (the Turkish photographer admitted he'd staged it, though it was already obvious to anyone who's seen a drowning victim IRL) certainly was a direct influence on the decisions made. It created the media hysteria that enabled Merkel to open the floodgates and drown Europe in the very "hordes of savages that descended on Europe at Frau Merkel's invitation". The picture came first, a thousand women assaulted and raped by Merkel's horde at Cologne train station came 6 months later.

So your use of the picture was mendacious and I can see why you've successfully triggered Pundit so badly.

The picture was not mendacious. It was entirely relevant to both the language being used, and the direct point about the motivation of Merkel's "invitation". The photo was a direct motivation. If you have your own political viewpoint about that photo and its impact, then that is up to you, but if Pundit removed it because he was 'triggered' then again, it proves that it was politically motivated censorship.

People can be triggered by all sorts of things, but this is another smokescreen - the image has been widely circulated for years and Pundit has posted many 'emotive' images of his own in the past to support his own political views and prides in trolling 'SJWs', 'snowflakes' and the like with his deliberately provocative articles. If he's 'triggered' from this image, then he's a hypocrite.

Don't worry about defending me S'mon against banning. I don't care. This thread is pretty much the only place I am posting on still and will not be continuing after it ends. There are other forums welcoming me in. I will say that at least you've shown consistency in your views, even if I vehemently disagree with them. I'll give you some Kudos for that at least.

[jeff37923]

The picture was not mendacious. It was entirely relevant to both the language being used, and the direct point about the motivation of Merkel's "invitation". The photo was a direct motivation. If you have your own political viewpoint about that photo and its impact, then that is up to you, but if Pundit removed it because he was 'triggered' then again, it proves that it was politically motivated censorship.

People can be triggered by all sorts of things, but this is another smokescreen - the image has been widely circulated for years and Pundit has posted many 'emotive' images of his own in the past to support his own political views and prides in trolling 'SJWs', 'snowflakes' and the like with his deliberately provocative articles. If he's 'triggered' from this image, then he's a hypocrite.

Don't worry about defending me S'mon against banning. I don't care. This thread is pretty much the only place I am posting on still and will not be continuing after it ends. There are other forums welcoming me in. I will say that at least you've shown consistency in your views, even if I vehemently disagree with them. I'll give you some Kudos for that at least.

So all of this is just you, Nexus, and Voros flopping around like fish out of water in an effort to "shame" Pundit?

[RPGPundit]

Did Trippy change his tag line?  I don't think so.  I think you did that Pundit.  I might be wrong.  But if you did that you need to make clear those are your words not his.  Forcing him to say what you want, is worse than banning him or restricting what he can say.  

Its attached to everyone of his posts.

Fair enough. Attributed.

Also preventing people from speaking who won't say what you want is censorship.

I'm asking him a question, for him to clarify. His refusal to do so proves that he knows the smarminess of what he did.

[RPGPundit]

Well, I gave him every opportunity.

He was constantly shitposting all over the Pundit's forum.  He posted shit political propaganda. But I still gave him a way out.

Then he went and lied about his his private message to me. When I posted that message in full to prove him a liar he kept right on lying.

He refused to answer a direct question from the admin.

He's just not worth my time at this point. He's made it obvious he has no interest in this site other than to engage in political flame-warfare. We don't need that here.

[S'mon]

Don't worry about defending me S'mon against banning. I don't care. This thread is pretty much the only place I am posting on still and will not be continuing after it ends. There are other forums welcoming me in. I will say that at least you've shown consistency in your views, even if I vehemently disagree with them. I'll give you some Kudos for that at least.

Er, thanks, Trippy! *thumbs up*

edit: too late, ah well.

[Voros]

If you only knew how funny I find this statement.

Jeff you've never once disagreed with Pundit on a single thing, I've seen you argue one side of an argument and then flip completely when Pundit posted in favour of the other side.

You pretend to be a big tough take no shit opinion-monger (pathetic enough) but in fact you desperately crave the approval of the regular posters here like an insecure junior high school kid.

Now go take those pills you need to keep the voices away and remember to pick up your government cheque so you can pay your bills on time.

[jeff37923]

Jeff you've never once disagreed with Pundit on a single thing, I've seen you argue one side of an argument and then flip completely when Pundit posted in favour of the other side.

Show some links proving this. Got any?

You pretend to be a big tough take no shit opinion-monger (pathetic enough) but in fact you desperately crave the approval of the regular posters here like an insecure junior high school kid.

Now go take those pills you need to keep the voices away and remember to pick up your government cheque so you can pay your bills on time.

And the fish just keep floppin' around.

Are you ever going to tell us what your goal was in doing all this?