This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: What Comes After "Yes".  (Read 2127 times)

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« on: July 03, 2008, 02:10:40 PM »
(Crosspost from Amagi)

Players declare actions for their characters all the time, stating that their character is doing this thing or that one. It’s fun to say yes. Saying yes, telling them that things happen as envisioned, giving them what they’re looking for, all keep energy up and running. When you can say yes without losing anything of value to the game, it’s a good thing to say.

SOMETIMES, “YES” IS ENOUGH.
Minor details, actions that just ‘fill in the backdrop’ and are meant to move the characters on to the good stuff? These aren’t the places to engage; these are ‘yes’ moments, and nothing more. The player wants to use their street lore to find a seedy bar where a fence hangs out? Yes. Move on, go, go, go.

SOMETIMES, IT’S NOT.
Let’s say that you have the world’s greatest swordfighter kicking around in your group. There will be swordfights. He will win them; most of them, without even breaking a sweat. You can say yes, all the time, but in this case, “yes” isn’t enough. The character has gone right past the question “Will you succeed?” and into territory that requires other issues to remain interesting. So here are a few of those:

• Rampant Confusion: Having the ability to throw a punch that can knock down a building leads inevitably to the question of what happens next when buildings actually get knocked down during fights, and of the character that can’t lose a straight fight being challenged not to win, but to either avoid dealing with incredible property damage, or face the problems that go with it.

• Moral Choices: The greatest swordsman in the world can easily disarm his foes, hold them at bay for hours, choose not to kill, turn them in to the law. Making this obvious to the player, and later, making it obvious to everyone that watches him fight, makes for an entirely different question from “can you beat them”.

• Showmanship And Spillover: A superb poet at court, engaged in a contest of performance, might well be assured of victory. By changing the question from whether or not they are going to win, to what they are using the contest as a platform to do, things change. If they choose to lampoon the king with their exquisite verse, or reveal the peccadilloes of the Captain of the Guard’s wife, or praise the virtues of a specific lady, things get more interesting - and it’s sometimes true that the player won’t even consider such possibilities unless you make a point of changing the context away from “do you win”?

• Famous And Drafted!: The highly skilled and the very best are often praised for their abilities, raising expectations, and potentially leading to odd repercussions. When the best gunfighter around starts getting challenges from fifteen-year-old wannabees, there are some decisions to be made. When the king decides that only you are capable of defeating the evil overlord of the north, and decides to ungraciously demand your service, likewise.

YOU’RE NOT ALWAYS THE BEST
The examples above are made especially clear by describing the characters involved as astonishingly skilled, the very best at what they do. Even so, the characters are often skilled enough that the same principle can be applied. Sometimes, victory simply isn’t interesting, but the other stuff that might or might not come along with that victory is.

CHALLENGES OR CHOICES?
All of the ways of changing a ‘simple win’ into something more engaging do so either by presenting an opportunity to make a choice that comes out from success, or by creating yet another, more difficult challenge layered on top of the apparently simple one. It’s possible to get ‘stuck’ in some of these situations, trying to figure out when to emphasize the challenge, adding the complications right in as part of dice-and-numbers resolution, and when to emphasize the choices, dropping hefty roleplaying right onto the players.

The way to determine whether to layer on more rules, or simply hit the player with a decision, is often best made not by following some special formula, but by looking at your players and figuring out which way would be most interesting to the group and the playing style to date. If the players were utterly engaged by combats until they got so big that the combat started to get weak? Layer it up - make it so the challenge isn’t killing the goblins, but keeping someone important to them but vulnerable safe from harm; their artifex, their fence, the inside man they’ve been paid to extract; keep the fights rolling, with added difficulties and confusions. If, on the other hand, the fights were never really the big thing, and the players aren’t especially engaged by tossing the dice around? Drop dilemmas in their laps, decisions only they can really make because in the place, at the time in question, they’re the ones that have the capacity to decide.

THIS BARELY SCRATCHES THE SURFACE
This article is only the barest hint at some of the interesting ways to approach these kinds of situations. The basic point to be made here is that “saying yes” to an action is by no means needs to be the end of resolving something. In many cases, it’s just the beginning.

SO, MY QUESTIONS
  • Do you think this article is broadly correct?
  • What are other good kinds of broad 'follow-up' to 'yes'; I hit the four that I could think up as I wrote, but I know there are planty more I didn't think of.
  • How do you know when to just "say yes" and move on, when to engage with choices, when to hit with challenges?  Is your method anything like mine?
(Note: This Article is Public Domain.  No Rights Reserved.)

Blackleaf

  • Voodoo Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • B
  • Posts: 4735
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2008, 02:28:44 PM »
Thanks for sharing this Levi.

I think any kind of GMing advice about "saying yes" is probably best if put in the context of:
  • when to say yes
  • when to say yes... but
  • when to say no
  • when to leave it to chance


Concrete examples of each of the above would be very helpful as well.

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2008, 02:39:45 PM »
Quote from: Stuart;221883
Thanks for sharing this Levi.

I think any kind of GMing advice about "saying yes" is probably best if put in the context of:
  • when to say yes
  • when to say yes... but
  • when to say no
  • when to leave it to chance


Concrete examples of each of the above would be very helpful as well.


Hmm.  Maybe?

I've often found that such advice often totally fails to address exactly the kind of thing the thread title names - that such advice treats the response as the end.

I wanted to get out of that particular line.

The Yann Waters

  • Doesn\'t Hate
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 2691
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2008, 02:44:10 PM »
But how common is nothing more than "just say 'yes'" in actual GM advice? Off the top of my head, I can't think of a single example.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

Blackleaf

  • Voodoo Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • B
  • Posts: 4735
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2008, 02:53:34 PM »
I guess it depends on what your intention for this is.  Advice for game designers?  Advice for Players and GMs (to be included in a game)?  Philosophical ponderings?

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2008, 02:54:57 PM »
Quote from: GrimGent;221886
But how common is nothing more than "just say 'yes'" in actual GM advice? Off the top of my head, I can't think of a single example.


You don't recall "Say yes or roll the dice"?

The Yann Waters

  • Doesn\'t Hate
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 2691
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2008, 02:58:25 PM »
Quote from: Levi Kornelsen;221890
You don't recall "Say yes or roll the dice"?
Ah, but that's different: the system takes over whenever there's a meaningful conflict. It's by no means an unconditional agreement to success and triumph.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2008, 03:05:10 PM »
Quote from: GrimGent;221892
Ah, but that's different: the system takes over whenever there's a meaningful conflict. It's by no means an unconditional agreement to success and triumph.


Right.  It's a whole other discussion.  But the article above could have gotten mired in that discussion if I'd written towards those points.

I think.

The Yann Waters

  • Doesn\'t Hate
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 2691
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2008, 03:34:32 PM »
In conventional RPGs the players can only ever describe the attempted actions of their characters, and denying them the right to make those decisions on their own would be horribly unjust. Under most circumstances, taking it for granted that "yes, they can try that" is simply fair, and the attempt can then be judged according to the proper system. But what the players cannot dictate are the consequences of those actions, and there will logically be consequences to everything. That's... elementary, if you want the events to proceed naturally and without adherence to any preconceived plotline.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2008, 03:47:26 PM »
Quote from: GrimGent;221898
But what the players cannot dictate are the consequences of those actions, and there will logically be consequences to everything. That's... elementary, if you want the events to proceed naturally and without adherence to any preconceived plotline.


...What does this have to do with the above, other than being "taken as read"?

The Yann Waters

  • Doesn\'t Hate
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 2691
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2008, 04:14:46 PM »
Quote from: Levi Kornelsen;221904
...What does this have to do with the above, other than being "taken as read"?

It's an inherent limit to the GM "saying yes, telling them that things happen as envisioned": the extent of that outcome (whether the characters succeed or fail) generally isn't for the other players to determine. Saying "yes" always comes with further consequences to challenge the characters. How could it not? One moment when everything goes according to the plan won't solve the rest of life's little problems, and no one guarantees that the plan wasn't going to make the situation worse from the beginning. Every choice matters.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2008, 04:23:31 PM »
Quote from: GrimGent;221914
Every choice matters.


Me stating I tie up my horse at a hitching post, and then walk into the bar VS. me just skipping to walking into the bar...

This is a choice of action that has consequences?

Blackleaf

  • Voodoo Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • B
  • Posts: 4735
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2008, 04:25:21 PM »
Quote from: Levi Kornelsen;221918
Me stating I tie up my horse at a hitching post, and then walk into the bar VS. me just skipping to walking into the bar...

This is a choice of action that has consequences?


Your horse won't wander off. :)

But if there's a fire in the Saloon... you need to make sure you untie your horse!

The Yann Waters

  • Doesn\'t Hate
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • T
  • Posts: 2691
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #13 on: July 03, 2008, 04:40:29 PM »
Quote from: Levi Kornelsen;221918
Me stating I tie up my horse at a hitching post, and then walk into the bar VS. me just skipping to walking into the bar...

This is a choice of action that has consequences?

If you specifically ride into the town, then choosing what to do with your horse while you are there can have significance, yes; and it's the kind of a detail that I'd keep in mind because PCs have been known to leave in a hurry, and having to steal another horse to get away would land them in trouble with law. Beyond that, there's no challenge in either of those actions, of course.
Previously known by the name of "GrimGent".

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
What Comes After "Yes".
« Reply #14 on: July 03, 2008, 04:48:40 PM »
Quote from: GrimGent;221922
Beyond that, there's no challenge in either of those actions, of course.


...That's exactly my confusion here.  Right up front, I noted that in the case of many actions, there's nothing to engage.  You just say "yep", and keep moving.

And you wanted to clarify with "everything has consequences", when  many 'detail' statements don't typically have any such thing - they're basically just flavour in the form of action.