Well, you DID say 'rate my evocativeness' in the title.
Well, if you wish to avoid the analysis or deflect it, then here: a gut reaction of myself and the two or three other people who posted guesses (I was a late show) all rated your CG names as some form of Lawful, thus, I rate, for that one catagory, a 'Not-Satisfactory'. The names do evoke, in at least three (four?I'm too lazy to scroll up and count...) out of three (or four?) posters lawful traits, not chaotic.
A word by word analysis isn't particularly necessary, from you, nor is it particularly helpful when you respond to less than half my word specific critiques with less than stunning counterpoints.
In fantasy with strong law/chaos axis (moorcock), and for the most part supported by common perception of the terms, chaos is changing, dynamic, active. Law is static, frozen even, staid. This is true even when law is also code for Good, and Chaos is seen as evil, though Chaos's change is seen as corrosive or corruptive, the staid nature of law is peace and comfort, order and assurance.
You have managed to pick words, for the worse, where six out of nine are inanimate objects. Things. Static. Of the remaining three, all are essentially duties, upholders of order even, though the definition you might have INTENDED might be different than the first one that comes to mind. Evocativeness is all about what comes to mind. Only the Champion term could be regarded as, at worst, neutral in this regard. I've already covered Warden...
Sentinel: A static guard, or perhaps watching a specific pattern. Sentinel has been applied to buildings and natural phenomenon for a reason, its a solid term for a generally solid thing. A man standing sentinel is not pictured as moving. In an opposed pair it's opposite is a raider, the embodiment of chaos, one who comes and goes, seemingly at random leavign destruction and change in his wake. the Sentinel opposes him, stands between the raider and the people.
You don't like my analysis? you don't have to buy it, you can explain it away. You want to deny my point then explain why 100% of respondents picked law for those names instead of chaos and what that says about teh evocativeness of the names.