This may sound a little strange ... but is an Editor who says "No, you cannot add this to the world" just one side of the coin?
Like, you could just as easily say that there is a role in which you are validating the input of your fellow players ... and that the editorial "blocking" that we've been talking about above is a case where you cease to be in that role.
Or, again, you could say that there is a role where you are judging the input of others, and that both blocking and accepting are consequences of that.
I'm not actually trying to make the whole conversation muddier :sweatdrop: It's just that, once I started thinking about this, I noticed that you can come at the same editorial moment from a lot of different angles, depending on where you sort of "frame the picture" in terms of what other things you think about as well. Is there a reason to pick the editorial act of saying "No" in preference to some of those other understandings?