SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

[Mechanic Idea] Whispered West

Started by Silverlion, November 15, 2007, 08:37:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Silverlion

I'm trying to avoid getting too "swinish" with my games  for most stick to easy mechanics that fit the genre.

To that end for my Horror Western game, I wanted to make use of poker chips (not cards because a "game" within a game like poker leads to too much focusing on the mechanic, and not enough on playing in character)

However, my idea was that each character has a series of measured abilities (+1 to +3), in categories Convictions (That is "I believe"), Reputations (That is "I am known for"), and good old Traits ("I am...")

Now the reason for the low number is a +1 indicates significant impact on play outcomes.


The basic idea I have, and am struggling with is: Each player bids a number of poker chips to show A) How much they are interested in the outcome of the events portrayed and B) How much they are willing to risk. Right now I was thinking 9 chips (each chip representing a potential consequence, with all 9 equaling death or removal of the character from play)

Now how it works is you roll a number of dice equal to the TOTAL bid of all parties in the scene. (D6's), a result of 5-6 allows you to earn back one consequence chip and "spend it" on your foe (essentially getting some of the outcome you want.) While a roll of 1-2 awards the chips to your opponant to spend against you. While a 3-4 means that number of chips stays in the pot.

Abilities invoked from above allows you to shift one die to a larger value (so if you evoke a reputation, a trait AND a conviction, you can shift three dice--or a single die by up to the total value of the abilities involved)


Now, the problem and hump I'm hitting is how do I get around this working for a group? Do they each bid? Then who rolls? All of them? Who gets the chips? Since there is a pool roll that splits do each Player roll a portion of the die? Or only a number of dice equal to the total consequence they risk (The problem with that is, that someone who bids two--only has minor impact on the scene, either way)

Plus I really want a way to "match" and "raise" bids on the outcome. I'm kinda frustrated because I know there MUST be a way to do this, but I'm just not seeing it.

I'd like players to be able to choose how much their characters are involved in a situation--but still not entirely be in control of how much the results can shift. After all its not always the one who risks the most in a gunfight that gets shot.

So any ideas? I want the game to give players control from their characters perspective, somewhat.. (but not require too much effort or wrestling with a system/slowing down play).
High Valor REVISED: A fantasy Dark Age RPG. Available NOW!
Hearts & Souls 2E Coming in 2019