This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Author Topic: Request for Comments: Combat System  (Read 642 times)


  • Newbie
  • *
  • a
  • Posts: 8
    • Hive, Queen, and Country
Request for Comments: Combat System
« on: July 11, 2021, 01:38:17 PM »

I'm looking for some feedback on some experimental combat rules for ballistic weapons. This is for the VSF 'Hive, Queen, and Country' setting / rule set.

The linked document (PDF format) explains the rules and how they were developed. The actual rules are only about 4 pages (pages 2-6) with examples. The bulk of the document is the sources and data used to come up with the modifiers.

The basic form of the rules is standard (roll to-hit, roll to-damage) and uses an 'opposed roll' system to get the right statistical distribution. I gathered data from a number of sources, particularly US DOD Project SALVO documents, to calibrate.

Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated! We're starting work on a book of 'space equipment', which this will probably be a part of.

Combat Rules (PDF)

Some more info on the setting:

Setting (PDF)
For more info, join the HQC mailing list:

Kyle Aaron

  • high-minded hack
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9333
  • high-minded hack
    • The Viking Hat GM
Re: Request for Comments: Combat System
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2021, 10:40:30 PM »
I think you've gone into a bit more detail than most people have an appetite for, which might be why you have a few hundred views but no comments. That's alright, you have to make the game you want to make, just be aware of the potential audience.

Speaking generally, my game design is motivated by - well, I work as a trainer, and I often work with some pretty smashed-up people. And the saying is that the difference between a medicine and a poison is the dosage. Training's the same: we want the minimum effective dose. I think the same about game rules: we want the minimum effective dose of rules. This is often less than you think.

In this video - from Townsends, a very wholesome fellow whom everyone should follow - the point is made that a three-legged stool will be steady on any ground, but a four-legged stool requires a perfectly flat finished floor. As usual, simpler is more adaptable and resilient - even down to the number of legs on your stool.

The Viking Hat GM
Conflict, the adventure game of modern warfare
Wastrel Wednesdays, livestream with Dungeondelver