SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Forge Theory Proven Wrong!

Started by Erik Boielle, October 30, 2006, 08:43:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

-E.

Quote from: Levi KornelsenI have respect for people thinking about games.  For people examining their play and telling other people what they found, which in turn helps other people get better play.  For folks looking at games as abstractions.

I have no respect for folks that decide to engage in long semantic debates when they know damn well what you're talking about.  I have no respect at all for people that snark at others simply because those others don't know a bunch of artificial words, no matter how useful those words have proven to some.  I despise not being able to tell those situations apart sometimes.

The theory we have right now, including mine, is a giant mishmash of stating the so-obvious-it's-usually-invisible, of brilliant ideas, stupid sacred cows, and filler.

Fair enough... I can respect that :D

Cheers,
-E.
 

flyingmice

Quote from: Levi KornelsenI have respect for people thinking about games.  For people examining their play and telling other people what they found, which in turn helps other people get better play.  For folks looking at games as abstractions.

I have no respect for folks that decide to engage in long semantic debates when they know damn well what you're talking about.  I have no respect at all for people that snark at others simply because those others don't know a bunch of artificial words, no matter how useful those words have proven to some.  I despise not being able to tell those situations apart sometimes.

The theory we have right now, including mine, is a giant mishmash of stating the so-obvious-it's-usually-invisible, of brilliant ideas, stupid sacred cows, and filler.

Which is why you are a gem, Levi! :D

-clash
clash bowley * Flying Mice Games - an Imprint of Better Mousetrap Games
Flying Mice home page: http://jalan.flyingmice.com/flyingmice.html
Currently Designing: StarCluster 4 - Wavefront Empire
Last Releases: SC4 - Dark Orbital, SC4 - Out of the Ruins,  SC4 - Sabre & World
Blog: I FLY BY NIGHT