This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.
The message boards have been upgraded. Please log in to your existing account by clicking here. It will ask twice, so that it can properly update your password and login information. If it has trouble recognizing your password, click the 'Forgot your password?' link to reset it with a new password sent to your email address on file.

Author Topic: Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?  (Read 1297 times)

Lawbag

  • Ghost of the Navigator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1100
    • View Profile
    • http://m.1asphost.com/Lawbag/
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« on: August 29, 2006, 07:36:17 AM »
Its been some time since this game came out, and Im wondering whether it actually accomplished its intended goals as a cut-down simplier more enjoyable version of DND.

And how does it compare directly with Green Ronin's and Levi's versions?

Or am I best sticking with DND Cyclopedia?
"See you on the Other Side"
 
Playing: Nothing
Running: Nothing
Planning: pathfinder amongst other things
 
Playing every Sunday in Bexleyheath, Kent, UK 6pm til late...

joewolz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1887
    • View Profile
    • http://2gms1mic.com
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2006, 09:12:15 AM »
I really enjoy the game, but I've just started a campaign of it.  I've done quite a few one shots with it.

It's nostalgic to play, but the system is unified and modern compared to the Cyclopedia.  I think it succeeds with what it's trying to do.
-JFC Wolz
Co-host of 2 Gms, 1 Mic

cnath.rm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • c
  • Posts: 528
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2006, 10:58:32 AM »
I got the main two books but haven't been able to play, is it just me or are there no demons or devils in the monster section of the Monsters and Treasure book?
"Dr.Who and CoC are, on the level of what the characters in it do, unbelievably freaking similar. The main difference is that in Dr. Who, Nyarlathotep is on your side, in the form of the Doctor."
-RPGPundit, discovering how BRP could be perfect for a DR Who campaign.

Take care Nothingland. You were always one of the most ridiculously good-looking sites on the internets, and the web too. I'll miss you.  -"Derek Zoolander MD" at a site long gone.

Mr. Christopher

  • Taste the Rainbow
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • M
  • Posts: 229
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2006, 11:22:33 AM »
Quote from: Lawbag
Its been some time since this game came out, and Im wondering whether it actually accomplished its intended goals as a cut-down simplier more enjoyable version of DND.

And how does it compare directly with Green Ronin's and Levi's versions?

Or am I best sticking with DND Cyclopedia?

I'll pimp Erin D. Smale's house rules again:

http://www.tridrpg.org/

Smale's adapted the best parts of C&C's "SIEGE Engine" to the Cyclopedia, so if you want the best of both systems his site's worth a visit.
Why are there so many songs about rainbows and what's on the other side? Rainbows are visions, but only illusions, and rainbows have nothing to hide.

JamesV

  • Revolutionary
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1581
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2006, 11:44:27 AM »
Quote from: William G. Gruff
Smale's adapted the best parts of C&C's "SIEGE Engine" to the Cyclopedia, so if you want the best of both systems his site's worth a visit.


I'm not quite liking the magic system, but the rest of it is excellent and reccomendable to anyone looking to make the RC better.
Running: Dogs of WAR - Beer & Pretzels & Bullets
Planning to Run: Godbound or Stars Without Number
Playing: Star Wars D20 Rev.

A lack of moderation doesn't mean saying every asshole thing that pops into your head.

jrients

  • robodroid warlock
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3318
    • View Profile
    • http://jrients.blogspot.com
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2006, 11:52:02 AM »
Quote from: Lawbag
Its been some time since this game came out, and Im wondering whether it actually accomplished its intended goals as a cut-down simplier more enjoyable version of DND.

And how does it compare directly with Green Ronin's and Levi's versions?


Are you fond of a lot of character classes, big books of monsters, and treasure tables?  C&C whups both in those areas.  There's a lot of games that I could run using True20 or Perfect20, but for old fashion monster-stomping treasure-grabbing fantasy I would choose C&C every time.

Quote
Or am I best sticking with DND Cyclopedia?


I can't blame someone for sticking with the Cyclopedia.  It's one of the best one-book RPGs every written.  But if I were pitching a game to a group of players who weren't there for the glory days of Basic/Expert/whatever D&D, then I would go with C&C.  The fact that it is in print and supported keeps you from having to deflect arguments about playing an 'old' or 'dead' game.  And the rules are close enough to mainstream D&D as to allow easier transitions for players.
Jeff Rients
My gameblog

JongWK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3010
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2006, 11:54:27 AM »
Can someone give a short explanation of C&C?
"I give the gift of endless imagination."
~~Gary Gygax (1938 - 2008)


cnath.rm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • c
  • Posts: 528
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2006, 11:58:03 AM »
Quote from: JongWK
Can someone give a short explanation of C&C?
1st Ed AD&D except simplified with one roll system. (you always want to roll high, just like in 3rd ed.)
"Dr.Who and CoC are, on the level of what the characters in it do, unbelievably freaking similar. The main difference is that in Dr. Who, Nyarlathotep is on your side, in the form of the Doctor."
-RPGPundit, discovering how BRP could be perfect for a DR Who campaign.

Take care Nothingland. You were always one of the most ridiculously good-looking sites on the internets, and the web too. I'll miss you.  -"Derek Zoolander MD" at a site long gone.

Mcrow

  • The Mountain That Rides
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2211
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2006, 12:00:37 PM »
Quote from: JongWK
Can someone give a short explanation of C&C?


Well it is basically old school D&D. Maybe a mix of 1st, 2nd , and 3rd edition in some ways.

Attacks roll d20 + attack bonus, if you roll over the AC of the target you hit. Hit points and AC work basically the same as D&D 3.5.

The Siege Engine is used in place of a skill system. You choose 2 stats as your "primes" (IIRC, 3 for humans). All checks are stat checks and the base DC is 18 (I think), but 12 instead if the stat you are using is a "prime" stat.

RPGPundit

  • Administrator - The Final Boss of Internet Shitlords
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46553
    • View Profile
    • http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2006, 12:30:52 PM »
I would say that, in essence, they didn't really succeed at what they were doing. The claim was that C&C would be like old school RC D&D or AD&D 1st. Instead, what it really ended up being was a simplified version of D&D 3.x with some nostalgia slapped on like a coat of paint.

On the other hand, that doesn't mean C&C is bad. Its still playable, and now it actually has a setting worth playing in what with Necromancer deciding to shift the Wilderlands/Invincible Overlord setting over to C&C (that automatically adds another coat of nostalgia paint on top of C&C, btw).

Its just, if you really want Old School, you have to go Old School.  I know that between C&C and The Rules Cyclopedia, I'm going with the RC every time.

RPGPundit
LION & DRAGON: Medieval-Authentic OSR Roleplaying is available now! You only THINK you've played 'medieval fantasy' until you play L&D.


My Blog:  http://therpgpundit.blogspot.com/
The most famous uruguayan gaming blog on the planet!

NEW!
Check out my short OSR supplements series; The RPGPundit Presents!


Dark Albion: The Rose War! The OSR fantasy setting of the history that inspired Shakespeare and Martin alike.
Also available in Variant Cover form!
Also, now with the CULTS OF CHAOS cult-generation sourcebook

ARROWS OF INDRA
Arrows of Indra: The Old-School Epic Indian RPG!
NOW AVAILABLE: AoI in print form

LORDS OF OLYMPUS
The new Diceless RPG of multiversal power, adventure and intrigue, now available.

jrients

  • robodroid warlock
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3318
    • View Profile
    • http://jrients.blogspot.com
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2006, 12:40:28 PM »
While I wouldn't go as far as calling it "D&D 3.x with some nostalgia slapped on like a coat of paint" I would agree that the final draft of C&C came out mechanically more like 3.x than I was expecting.  But I still think its a neat little game.  If mastery of the 3.5 version of the game wasn't my own personal great white whale, I'd probably be running C&C right now.
Jeff Rients
My gameblog

Pete

  • Just plain likes games!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • P
  • Posts: 502
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2006, 04:43:21 PM »
Quote from: RPGPundit

On the other hand, that doesn't mean C&C is bad. Its still playable, and now it actually has a setting worth playing in what with Necromancer deciding to shift the Wilderlands/Invincible Overlord setting over to C&C (that automatically adds another coat of nostalgia paint on top of C&C, btw).
RPGPundit


Actually, Necromancer is not shifing anything over to C&C -- in fact, Necro has said that after Tegel Manor is published (GenCon '07 is the latest release date), they won't be doing any more Judges Guild stuff.  The new Wilderlands project is a separate entity that's going to be published through Troll Lords.
 

Lawbag

  • Ghost of the Navigator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1100
    • View Profile
    • http://m.1asphost.com/Lawbag/
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2006, 05:08:06 PM »
I was expecting Levi to come in and pimp (in a good way) his game, because his is the only free D20 variant of the trio.
"See you on the Other Side"
 
Playing: Nothing
Running: Nothing
Planning: pathfinder amongst other things
 
Playing every Sunday in Bexleyheath, Kent, UK 6pm til late...

joewolz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1887
    • View Profile
    • http://2gms1mic.com
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2006, 05:39:27 PM »
Levi's game is pretty cool, but it doesn't beat C&C.  I'm too young for the RC to seem playable, having only been introduced to roleplaying through AD&D 2nd...which I never liked.

C&C is more than nostalgia, it's a good rules light system that to me is a decent version of d20.  What I don't like about d20 are the damn skills and feats and all that extraneous stuff.  I'd like to have a bit more control over my character in a fantasy story.
-JFC Wolz
Co-host of 2 Gms, 1 Mic

Levi Kornelsen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • L
  • Posts: 2054
    • View Profile
Did Castles and Crusades perform its remit?
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2006, 06:12:13 PM »
Quote from: Lawbag
I was expecting Levi to come in and pimp (in a good way) his game, because his is the only free D20 variant of the trio.


*Shrug*

I haven't played C&C, so I can't make a good comparison to pimp with.