SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

A Vote

Started by RPGPundit, December 18, 2006, 11:05:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

JongWK

Hmm...

Game Design & Tips?
"I give the gift of endless imagination."
~~Gary Gygax (1938 - 2008)


dsivis

"It\'s a Druish conspiracy. Haven\'t you read the Protocols of the Elders of Albion?" - clash

John Morrow

Quote from: RPGPunditProposed: that this forum's title be changed from "Game Design and Theory Forum" to "RPG Design and Game Master Coaching".

Yea, or nay? And why?

Nay.  I think the idea behind the change is good but "Coaching" is awful.  How about something like "RPG Design and Practical Gaming Advice" or something like that.  Emphasis on the "Practical". :)
Robin Laws\' Game Styles Quiz Results:
Method Actor 100%, Butt-Kicker 75%, Tactician 42%, Storyteller 33%, Power Gamer 33%, Casual Gamer 33%, Specialist 17%

Kyle Aaron

Quote from: Levi KornelsenWhich is weird, cuz' I got the term from JimBob.
Well, the main idea was to distinguish it from "theory." Because not many gamers are interested in labelling their play style as "Alphaist" or "Boggist" or whatever, nor are they interested in discussing "scene framing" and stuff like that. But if you want to talk about how to scare players in a horror game, or whether giving out xp for this stuff encourages that other stuff, okay, people like to talk about that.

The stuff that sits around by itself and which you can discuss without naming any roleplaying game, or talking about what your game group did last night - that stuff is "theory." The stuff you can't separate from any particular roleplaying game book or session, that's "craft."

I'm not that fond of the word "craft," either. But I'm even less fond of "theory", both as a word and a bunch of ideas. The theory/craft or pure/applied split is one you see all over the place, it's a useful distinction.

In deciding whether to rename the subforum, what you have to decide is whether theory is welcome at all in the forum as a whole. Me, I'm happy to exclude pure theory from discussion, leaving us with applied craft. So I say, yep, rename it.

If I were to be designing an rpg forum, I'd probably give it subforums like this,

Roleplaying Discussion
For general discussion, rants and raves and anything else to do with gaming.

Recruitment
Discuss new campaign ideas and gauge interest from other gamers on

Game Design & House Rules
Adding house rules to your system? Turning your house rules into a whole system? Come here!

Over a Pint
Non-gaming banter and anything else that doesn't fit into the other forums

I wouldn't give "Craft" or "GM Coaching" its own subforum. It overlaps too much with general roleplaying game discussion. I've noticed here on this forum that "craft" sorts of discussions have happened in the main roleplaying subforum, and gone very well, with lots of interest. In the "craft" subforum, the same topics have fallen flat.

"Hosue rules" are probably "craft", really, but I'd still put them separately, because house rules really are game design. You're designing part of a game based on another game. Well, speaking from experience, when you design a whole game, you have to do it in parts, too.
The Viking Hat GM
Conflict, the adventure game of modern warfare
Wastrel Wednesdays, livestream with Dungeondelver

joewolz

Quote from: SettembriniMy vote is for

Game Design & DM Coaching



I'll stop coming here if any proprietary words or acronyms are put in any of the forum names.  

I don't want there to be no place on the internet for dissenting theory.  That name would kill it , Sett.

I also vote "nay" on the name being changed to "RPG Design and Game Master Coaching"

Change it to RPG Design and Craft.  I like that suggestion.
-JFC Wolz
Co-host of 2 Gms, 1 Mic

Settembrini

QuoteIt overlaps too much with general roleplaying game discussion. I've noticed here on this forum that "craft" sorts of discussions have happened in the main roleplaying subforum, and gone very well, with lots of interest.

You convinced me. Having different subforae isn´t always helping. Less is more, sometimes. No need to label and seperate technique talk, let it just spread and bloom on it´s own!

@GM vs DM: I really don´t care much. Whatever gives you a better feeling.
If there can\'t be a TPK against the will of the players it\'s not an RPG.- Pierce Inverarity

JongWK

Quote from: JimBobOzGame Design & House Rules
Adding house rules to your system? Turning your house rules into a whole system? Come here!

Ohh... I like this.
"I give the gift of endless imagination."
~~Gary Gygax (1938 - 2008)


Blackleaf

House RULES!

"Gotta have House Music all night long... With that House Music you can't go wrong..." :p

Sacrificial Lamb

"Game Design", or "RPG Design", I can tolerate; but PLEASE don't call it "Craft" or "Coaching". The two "C's" sound lame to me. Craft makes me think of knitting a sweater, or reminds me of butter. Isn't there a butter named "Craft"? And Coaching.....eh...I don't like it.

Keep the name, short but sweet. Please? :(

kregmosier

i'm down for whatever as long as the section of the site containing -ism's is clearly marked so i can avoid it.
-k
middle-school renaissance

i wrote the Dead; you can get it for free here.

droog

The thing about 'coaching' is: who's coaching whom? It just isn't like that.
The past lives on in your front room
The poor still weak the rich still rule
History lives in the books at home
The books at home

Gang of Four
[/size]

David R

Game Design & GM Workshop

Regards,
David R

Sacrificial Lamb

Quote from: David RGame Design & GM Workshop

Regards,
David R

Not bad, but the problem is that it makes me think of "Games Workshop". That's probably not our goal, however. :)

David R

Quote from: Sacrificial LambNot bad, but the problem is that it makes me think of "Games Workshop". That's probably not our goal, however. :)

Very true.

My original idea was lumping the whole forum under the heading GameWorks...but I thought the Pundit may have a heart attack :D

Regards,
David R

arminius

How about "RPG Design & Analysis" plus (if it's included here and not in the general forum) "GMing Workshop" ?