SPECIAL NOTICE
Malicious code was found on the site, which has been removed, but would have been able to access files and the database, revealing email addresses, posts, and encoded passwords (which would need to be decoded). However, there is no direct evidence that any such activity occurred. REGARDLESS, BE SURE TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORDS. And as is good practice, remember to never use the same password on more than one site. While performing housekeeping, we also decided to upgrade the forums.
This is a site for discussing roleplaying games. Have fun doing so, but there is one major rule: do not discuss political issues that aren't directly and uniquely related to the subject of the thread and about gaming. While this site is dedicated to free speech, the following will not be tolerated: devolving a thread into unrelated political discussion, sockpuppeting (using multiple and/or bogus accounts), disrupting topics without contributing to them, and posting images that could get someone fired in the workplace (an external link is OK, but clearly mark it as Not Safe For Work, or NSFW). If you receive a warning, please take it seriously and either move on to another topic or steer the discussion back to its original RPG-related theme.

Dark Albion Questions

Started by PencilBoy99, December 23, 2020, 11:01:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

PencilBoy99

December 23, 2020, 11:01:10 AM
1. About what time in the real world is equivalent to Dark Albion?

2. I noticed in Lion and Dragon there are guns but also lots of people in Plate Armor and bowmen. Didn't guns make Plate Armor and bowmen extraneous. Guns punch right through plate armor and it's much quicker to train a gunman than use the English Longbow.

Eirikrautha

#1
February 21, 2021, 03:20:17 PM
Quote from: PencilBoy99 on December 23, 2020, 11:01:10 AM
Guns punch right through plate armor

It's much quicker to train a gunman than use the English Longbow.
False, and true.  Early firearms did not punch through plate (in fact, many surviving sets of armor from that period have visible "proving" marks where they were tested by firing a firearm at them and showing it would not penetrate).  Instead, really heavy armor was a response to early firearms (you didn't need full plate to stop a sword or spear).  Later, when the power and availability of firearms became more of a factor, they did become much easier to equip troops with (and far easier to train them in using).  From that point forward, heavy armor became more trouble than it was worth...
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions